Abortion Activists
Forget George Tiller Killed, Injured Women in Botched Abortions
Since his shooting death,…the mainstream media and
abortion advocates have gone out of their way to paint late-term
abortion practitioner George Tiller as a champion of women. However,
their portrayal of Tiller neglects any mention of the women he killed or
injured in botched abortions.
While hundreds of pro-life groups have forcefully
condemned alleged gunman Scott Roeder for killing Tiller and while his
record presents no reason for his death, Tiller was anything but a
protector of women’s health. Perhaps the biggest blunder in Tiller’s
career of doing legal, and supposedly safe, abortions was the death of
Christen Gilbert. Gilbert was a 19-year-old mentally disabled girl from
Texas who was killed in a botched legal abortion done at Tiller’s
abortion business in Wichita in January 2005.
After the botched abortion, Gilbert was rushed into
the Wesley Medical Center ER, followed by Tiller moments later. She
eventually died. Following Gilbert’s death, the Kansas Board of Healing
Arts, which regulates doctors in the state, refused to prosecute Tiller
for killing Gilbert, saying he followed all state laws during the
abortion procedure.
—LifeNews.com
Watchdog Says Media
Bias Evident in Coverage of Killing of Abortion Practitioner
A leading media watchdog says media bias is clearly
evident in the mainstream media’s coverage of the shooting death of
late-term abortion practitioner George Tiller. Brent Bozell of the Media
Research Center points out that many outlets have condemned pro-life
advocates. Others, Bozell says, have gone out of their way to interview
abortion advocates or find obscure or even anonymous people who are
supposedly pro-life and applaud the Tiller killing. “The national media
had zero interest in spotlighting a pro-life spokesman expressing
horror.…”
Bozell points to several media outlets where the
majority of Americans who are pro-life didn’t get a fair shake. Keith
Olbermann started his MSNBC program with these words: “A religious jihad
by fundamentalist crusaders who believe that murder is justified, their
acts of violence having the intended effect of changing behavior.”
Bozell explains: “He was referring to conservative
politicians and bloggers and the Fox News Channel. Olbermann insisted
there was a ‘straight line’ of culpability” from pro-life advocates to
alleged gunman Scott Roeder, despite the fact he has no affiliations
with any pro-life group.
—LifeNews.com
Maryland Judge Rules
for Pro-Life Advocates Shackled, Strip-Searched by Police
A federal judge in Maryland has sided with pro-life
advocates who have filed a lawsuit against State Police, Harford County
and the city of Bel Air. The case involved an Alliance Defense Fund
lawsuit on behalf of pro-life women who were shackled and strip searched
after peacefully protesting abortion in Maryland. The incident involves
a group of pro-life advocates who, in August 2008, were arrested without
warning by Hartford County State Troopers during their multi-city
protest featuring abortion signs. At least a dozen police officers
arrived in more than seven marked vehicles and then arrested, jailed,
shackled and strip-searched them. Alliance Defense Fund and allied
attorneys filed a lawsuit against Harford County, the town of Bel Air,
and seven police officials on behalf of the young women.
—LifeNews.com
Nebraska Adopts
Strong Abortion Ultrasound Law
Nebraska has enacted what is being described as one
of the country’s strongest ultrasound bills for women considering
abortion.
The single-chamber Nebraska legislature voted 40-5
May 29 for the legislation, and Governor Dave Heineman, a Republican,
signed the measure into law the same day.
What sets apart the new Nebraska law from other
states is its requirement when an ultrasound is performed that an
abortion doctor display the image for the mother to see rather than
requiring the woman to ask for the sonogram to be shown, according to
the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC). Under the law, the mother
can choose whether to view the image.
The law also requires an abortion provider to
inform the woman considering the abortion of the medical risks of the
procedure and the estimated age of the unborn child. In addition, it
mandates she be told she cannot be forced to choose an abortion and that
assistance is available if she decides to give birth.…
Eighteen other states have ultrasound laws,
according to National Right to Life.
—Baptist Press
Georgia to Become
First State With Embryo Adoption Law
The nation’s first law governing the adoption of
embryos is set to take effect in Georgia after being passed by the
legislature and signed by the governor.
The “Option of Adoption Act,” which will go into
effect July 1, will provide safeguards for both parties involved in an
embryo adoption, which is a unique form of adoption in which a
couple—often an infertile one—adopts one or more surplus embryos from a
couple who has undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Embryo adoption allows the adopting mother to
experience pregnancy and has been promoted by pro-lifers for years but,
until now, has not been governed by the laws of any state.
Significantly, the Georgia bill amends Georgia’s adoption laws to make
clear that embryo adoption in fact is a form of adoption.…
Couples who undergo an embryo adoption in a state
without such a law as Georgia’s must sign private legal contracts that
treat the embryo as property. The new Georgia law defines an embryo as
“an individualized fertilized ovum of the human species from the
single-cell stage to eight-week development.”…
Dan Becker, the president of Georgia Right to Life,
said the law is noteworthy not only because of its first-in-the-nation
status but also because of the way it defines an embryo.
“We become the first state in the nation to, in our
code, define an embryo as beginning at the single stage,” he said.
“…That’s a huge move forward and one that was fought quite aggressively
by the pro-abortion side of the equation.”
—Michael Foust for Baptist Press
California Supreme
Court Creates Legal Chaos and Disruption Over Proposition 8
May 28, 2009, the California Supreme Court upheld
the right of citizens to amend the state constitution to define marriage
as a one-man, one-woman union. I have praised the court for upholding
Proposition 8. However, the court also ruled that the 18,000 gay
marriages already performed in the state are legal. For this, the court
deserves condemnation.
The court created this problem in the first place
by ruling in 2008 that Proposition 22, passed in 2000, was
unconstitutional. Prop. 22 was passed by 61.4 percent of the voters. It
was a Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage in statue as a union
of one man and one woman.
After the court overturned this Act, pro-family
forces in California organized a massive campaign to amend the state
constitution to protect marriage from being redefined by unelected
judges and radical gay activists.
—Louis P. Sheldon, Traditional Values Coalition
New Hampshire “Gay
Marriage” Opponents Hope to Hit “Undo” in 2010
New Hampshire may have legalized “gay marriage,”
but if opponents of the new law get their way, a new governor and a new
legislature will hit the “undo” button and reverse course on the issue
in two years.
Flipping the governor’s office and the legislature
from Democrat to Republican in 2010 is a bold goal, and it offers no
guarantees, but it’s the only option social conservatives in New
Hampshire have now that the state has become the sixth nationwide to
redefine marriage to include homosexuals.
New Hampshire Democratic Governor John Lynch signed
the bill…after it passed the Democratic-led legislature.
Unlike other states, New Hampshire law does not
allow citizens to gather signatures to put a constitutional amendment on
the ballot banning “gay marriage.” Any recourse must start with the
legislature, which traditionally had been controlled by Republicans but
which has been held by Democrats for two terms.
“I think we have a good chance of that happening,
because I think people are so disgusted with what this legislature has
done this year,” Kevin Smith, executive director of the conservative New
Hampshire-based Cornerstone Policy Research, told Baptist Press. “The
goal after that would be to repeal the law.”
Smith isn’t proposing the law be repealed by a
constitutional amendment but by a state statute—a bill—in the same
manner the law came into being. Unlike Massachusetts, Connecticut and
Iowa—states that had court rulings legalizing “gay marriage”—New
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine redefined marriage simply by passing a law,
which means it presumably can be reversed by passing another law. Of
those three latter states, New Hampshire is the most conservative and
seems the most likely to change course at the legislative level.…
Smith rejects the popular notion that once “gay
marriage” is legalized it’s nearly impossible to repeal. He points to
what happened in California, where voters there passed a constitutional
amendment to overturn a state Supreme Court ruling legalizing “gay
marriage.”…
“I think the voters are so disenfranchised that
they haven’t had their say on this issue that they want to have their
say on it,” Smith said. “I think the horse can be put back in the barn,
sure.”
—Michael Foust for Baptist Press
Alameda, California
Elementary School Children to Be Indoctrinated With Gay Curriculum
Providing yet another example of the threat that
“gay marriage” and the gay agenda provide to school children and
parental authority, the Alameda Unified School District [May 26] adopted
a new curriculum over the objections of hundreds of parents who
testified at the board hearings. The newly adopted curriculum
specifically elevates respect for gay, lesbian and bisexual students and
their families over respect for diverse racial and religious
backgrounds.
…Ron Prentice, chairman, ProtectMarriage.com…noted
that the curriculum does not provide parents with any sort of opt-out
right for their students.…
…[S]aid Prentice, “It is a parent’s responsibility
to protect his children from inappropriate and biased content. With the
Alameda School District’s decision to adopt pro-homosexual instructional
materials, a parent’s job has become that much more difficult.…By the
school board’s decree, many public school children will be trained in
beliefs that contradict those of the home. It is no wonder that
homeschooling and private education continue to grow in California.”
—Christian Newswire
Two National
Rabbinic Groups Issue Religious Ban on Voting for Pro-Homosexual Agenda
Politicians
In light of recent developments in the ongoing push
to legislate a Federal Hate Crimes Bill in Congress and same-gender
marriage legislation in New York and other states, Rabbi Yehuda Levin,
spokesman for the 65-year-old Orthodox Jewish national Rabbinic
organization Rabbinical Alliance of America, surrounded by Rabbis,
issued a religious ban on voting for any politician or office holder who
supports any aspect of the homosexual political agenda.
Rabbi Levin also called upon other Orthodox Jewish
religious and civic organizations such as Agudath Israel of America, the
OU, the Rabbinical Council of America, Chabad and the Chasidic groups to
follow suit.
Furthermore, the Rabbis addressed Christian
denominations including the Southern Baptist Convention, the
Pentecostals, other evangelical denominations and the National
Conference of Catholic Bishops urging them speedily to employ similar
bans.
“If the religious groups, consisting of tens of
millions,…draw a line in the sand, even at this late stage of the
devolving culture and its destruction of religious liberty, we can still
save the day. But it’s very late in the game,” said Levin.
…Similarly, Blacks and Latinos were urged to reject
the comparison of the “gay” agenda and same-gender marriage with the
legitimate civil rights movement of the aforementioned minorities.
—Christian Newswire
More
Noteworthy News items can be found in every issue of THE SWORD OF THE
LORD.
Subscribe today!
