J.
Wilbur Chapman
1859-1918
“It is a very difficult thing to make a rule for another to live
by. The rule which governs my life is this: anything that
dims my vision of Christ, or takes away my taste for Bible study, or cramps
me in my prayer life, or makes Christian work difficult, is wrong for me.; and I must,
as a Christian, turn away from it.”
Though J. Wilbur Chapman was not converted until years later, at the
age of four he was often seen standing on his chair for a pulpit, acting
out the role of preacher.
A Presbyterian,
he had great success in four pastorates, but is best remembered as a
powerful evangelist.
Greatly
influenced for Christ as a young man by a godly mother and a spiritual father,
he was led to accept Christ by his Sunday school teacher and later found
absolute assurance that he was a child of God through the personal
counseling of Dwight L. Moody.
Why was he such
a success as a pastor and leader? “His unusual power with men, his
never-failing friendliness, his positive and comprehensive preaching, his
extraordinary genius for organization, and the unprecedented results of
his manifold labors,” are the reasons given by his biographer, Mr. Ford Ottman.
Mr. Ottman reports, “He made fluent use of an adequate
vocabulary, and it was said his full, round and firm voice, when rising
to a climax, developed a depth and power comparable to thunder at a
distance; yet it had a musical tenderness, a pathos almost like tears, a
throb, a tremolo-stop, as in the grand organ, perfectly adapted to the
wonderful expression of God’s symphony, of God’s love and grace and
sufficiency.”
Through his
teaching, preaching, and greatly used Bible conferences, he influenced
thousands of Christians to have a deeper, more effective devotion to
Christ and the Bible. He won many thousands to the Lord in his
evangelistic meetings.
Though he had an
unusual sense of humor, he seldom joked; yet he trained an excitable,
vehement seeker of souls to carry on after he was gone—a young baseball
player named Billy Sunday. No two men were ever more different in
their methods; no two ever agreed more completely on their message.
|